پدیدارشناسی تجارب زیسته اساتید حسابداری از آموزش حسابداری بخش عمومی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه حسابداری، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

2 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه حسابداری، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

3 کارشناس ارشد، گروه حسابداری، دانشکده حسابداری و مدیریت، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران،ایران.

10.30473/gaa.2025.69180.1681

چکیده

موضوع و هدف مقاله: هدف پژوهش حاضر شناخت دیدگاه‌ها و تجارب زیسته اساتید رشتة حسابداری از آموزش حسابداری بخش عمومی است.
روش پژوهش: این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و برحسب گردآوری داده یک پژوهش کیفی از نوع پدیدارشناسی توصیفی است. مشارکت‌کنندگان این مطالعه به تعداد 12 نفر و با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدف‌مند در دانشگاه‌های کشور انتخاب شدند. در جمع‌آوری داده‌های مورد نیاز از روش مصاحبه فردی نیمه‌ساختار یافته تا رسیدن به حد اشباع نظری استفاده شد. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از روش کدگذاری موضوعی و برای بررسی روایی و پایایی مصاحبه‌ها نیز از چهار مفهوم قابلیت اعتماد، قابلیت انتقال، قابلیت تأیید و اطمینان‌پذیری بهره‌بردای شده است.
یافته‌های پژوهش: در مجموع براساس نظرات و دیدگاه‌های اساتید، 4 مضمون اصلی چالش‌ها و موانع زمینه‌ای و محتوایی، تعامل‌پذیری و مسئولیت‌پذیری ذینفعان، فرصت‌ها و مزایای آموزشی و پژوهشی و ویژگی‌های ساختاری و رفتاری اساتید شناسایی گردید. برای 4 مضمون اصلی نیز مجموعاً 48 مضمون فرعی با 106 کد مفهومی استخراج شد.
نتیجه‌گیری، اصالت و افزوده آن به دانش: بیشترین روایت‌ها در ارتباط با مضمون اصلی ویژگی‌های ساختاری و رفتاری اساتید شناسایی گردید، این یافته لزوم توجه به این دغدغه توسط گروه‌های آموزشی حسابداری را منعکس می‌کند. یافته‌های پژوهش، حاکی از نقش مهم اساتید در رفع موانع و چالش‌های آموزش حسابداری بخش عمومی خصوصاً از طریق بازنگری در روش‌ها و الگوهای تدریس و محتوای آموزشی با هدف افزایش جذابیت یادگیری و جلب توجه مخاطبان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Phenomenology of the Lived Experiences of Accounting Professors from Public Sector Accounting Education

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sajad Naghdi 1
  • roghayye jeddi 2
  • javad esmaeili 3
  • vahid ahmadian 1
1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economic and Management, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 M.Sc. Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Management, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
3 M.Sc. Department of Accounting, Faculty of Accounting and Management, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Subject and Objective of the Article: The aim of the current research is to know the views and lived experiences of accounting professors from the public sector accounting education.
Research Method: This research is practical in terms of purpose, and in terms of data collection, it is a qualitative research. The participants of this study were 12 people selected using the purposeful sampling method.In collecting the required data, a semi-structured interview method was used until reaching theoretical saturation. Thematic coding analysis method was used to analyze the data and the four concepts of credibility, transferability, confirmability and transferability were used to check the validity and reliability of the interviews.
Findings: In total, based on the opinions and views of professors, four main themes including background and content challenges and obstacles, stakeholders' interactivity and responsibility, educational and research opportunities and benefits, and professors' structural and behavioral characteristics were identified, For 4 main themes, a total of 48 sub-themes with 106 conceptual codes were extracted.
Conclusion, Originality and its Contribution to Knowledge: Most of the narratives were identified in the sub-theme of professors' structural and behavioral characteristics, This finding reflects the need to pay attention to this concern of students by accounting educational groups. The findings of the research indicate the important role of professors in solving the challenges of accounting education in the public sector, especially through the revision of teaching methods and educational content with the aim of increasing the attractiveness of learning and attracting the attention of the students.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Education
  • Public Sector Accounting
  • Phenomenology
Adam, B; Brusca, I; Caperchione, E; Heiling, J; Jorge, S. M. F; & Rossi, F. M. (2019). Are higher education institutions in Europe preparing students for IPSAS? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(2/3): 363–378.
Ahmed, I. (2019). Bridging the gap between governmental accounting education and practice.Accounting, 5(1): 21-30.
Aghaei Qehi, A and Nouri, F. (2021). Public sector accounting education based on active learning methods and new technologies. Public Sector, Accounting and Budgeting, 2(5): 42-51. (In Persian).
Arefinahad, A; Gholamzade, D; Vedadi, A. (2024). Analyzing the Effective Factors of Human Resource Training in Government Banking. Governmental Accounting, 10(2), 125-142. (In Persian).
Baylis, R. M; Widt, D. D; Helikum, L. J; & Ashworth, R. (2024). Debate: The lack of public sector accounting education within universities and what is next. Public Money & Management, 1–2.
Basloom, R, S; Mohamad, M, H, Auzair. (2022). Applaicability of public sector refom initiatives of the Yemeni government from the integrated TOE-DOI framework, International Journal of Innovation Studies, 6, 286-302.
Braun, V; Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology; 3(2): 77-101.
Caruana, J; Dabbicco, G; Jorge, S; & Jesus, M. A. (2019). The development of EPSAS: Contributions from the literature, Accounting in Europe, 16 (2): 146–176.
Cohen, S; & Karatzimas, S. (2022). New development: Public sector accounting education for users—embedding eLearning and technology in teaching. Public Money & Management, 42(4): 291– 293.
Cordery, C. (2013). Does public services accounting belong in the curriculum? Pacific Accounting Review, 25(1): 101‑116.
Delavar A.(2010). Qualitative methodology. Rahbord; 19(54): 307-329. (In Persian).
Finley, W; & Waymire, T. R. (2013). Thinking practice: Iteration, peer review, and policy analysis in a governmental accounting class. Journal of Accounting Education, 31: 333–349.
Ghodselahi, A; rohani, A; & Hasangholipour, T. (2014). Phenomenology in Consumer Research. New Marketing Research Journal4(3), 107-132. (In Persian).
Guba, E, G; Lincoln, Y, S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research, Handbook of qualitative research, London CA: Sage.
Heiling, J, Jorge, S, Karatzimas, S, and Aggestam-Pontoppidan, C. (2022). Public Sector Accounting Education—Stocktaking, Challenges and Innovations, Public Money & Management, 42(7): 538-540.
Henry, B.K. (2005). A Survey of Governmental Accounting Education Studies, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 17(2): 166-179.
Hoque, Z. (2002). Using journal articles to teach public sector accounting
in higher education. Journal of Accounting Education, 20(3): 139–161.
Jafi, H; & Youssef, S. (2021). Public sector accounting education and training as supportive mechanisms of the ongoing accrual-based accounting reforms. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 25(1): 1–8.
Karatzimas, S; Heiling, J; & AggestamPontoppidan, C. (2022). Public sector accounting education: A structured literature review. Public Money and Management42(7): 543-550. 
Krah, R. Y; Aveh, F. K. (2013). Public Sector Accounting Education: A Neglected Element of Public Financial Management Reforms in Ghana. International Journal of Governmental Financial Management, XIII(1): 36–49.
Mohamed, E. K. A; & Lashine, S. H. (2010). Accounting knowledge and skills and the challenges of a global business environment. Managerial Finance, 29(7): 3–16.
Naghdi, S; Jeddi, R. (2023). Phenomenological Exploring of the Lived Experiences of Candidates Participating in the CPA Exam. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting20(79), 205-243. (In Persian).
Neves, F. R; Busanelli de Aquino, A. C; & Batista da Silva, P. (2022). New development: The challenges of public sector accounting education in business schools. Public Money & Management, 42(7(: 569-572.
Nourani, H; Akhlaqi Yazdi Nejad, I. (2023). Presenting a model for solving the challenges and bottlenecks of public sector accounting standards using Grand theory. Governmental Accounting, 9(2), 151-168. (In Persian).
Parvari, P. (2019).The transition from philosophy to methodology, a new reading of the phenomenology method: the foundation of philosophical approaches and implementation steps, Sociological studies, 11(44): 87-106. (In Persian).
Pauluzzo, R; Fedele, P; Pericolo, E; & Dokalskaya, I. (2024). The future of public sector accounting education: A structured literature review. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 1–41.
Pitulice, I, C; Profiroiu, A. G; and Ștefănescu, A. (2018). Government accounting education for university undergraduates. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 14:75-91.
Rapport, f, & wainwright, p. (2006). Phenomenology as a paradigm of movement, nursing inquiry, 13 (3): 228- 236.
Reck, J. L; Lowensohn, S. L; Wilson, E. R; & Hay, L. E. (2013). Accounting for governmental & nonprofit entities. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Reginato, E; Fadda, I; & Paglietti, P. (2016). The influence of resistance to
change on public-sector reform implementation: The case of Italian municipalities’ internal control system. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(12): 989–999.
Reichard,C, Küchler-Stahn,N & Siegel, J. (2023). Education in public sector accounting at higher education institutions in Germany, Public Money & Management, doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2247709.
Rezaei, M. (2018). Investigate Obstacles of Advances Public Sector Accounting in Iran From the perspective of academics. Accounting and Auditing Research10(38), 81-94. (In Persian).
Sari, F, v, and Afriyenti. (2020). Obstacles and Challenges in Government Accounting Education (Case Study in Padang State University), 4th Padang International Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Asian Review of Accounting, 16(3): 246–262.
Sciulli, N; & Sims, R. (2008). Public sector accounting education in Australian universities: Obstacles and opportunities, Asian Review of Accounting, 16, 246-262.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods, (Vol. 5): sage.