Providing a comprehensive model of electronic tax receipt to reduce tax evasion with the ISM approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Prof. Department of Accounting, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Instructor of Accounting , payame Noor University, Tehran, IRAN

3 PhD student, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

Subject and Objective of the article: the need for a comprehensive electronic tax collection model can minimize tax evasion is felt. Therefore, this research was implemented with the aim of providing a comprehensive model of electronic tax collection to reduce tax evasion with the ISM approach.
Research Method: This research is exploratory-applied. Research information was collected by interviewing 15 tax experts. The collected data were analyzed using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM).
Research Findings: The findings showed that the reduction of tax evasion is the most effective factor in the exploratory model. In three levels, respectively, factors of financial and transactional sanctions for tax violators and electronic tax education, factors of intelligent detection of taxable income of natural and legal persons, creating transparency by creating comprehensive information systems and using artificial intelligence and big data in calculations, factors of dedicated network Receiving and paying taxes, connecting and communicating with the administrative and executive system of the country and integrating the financial and banking systems in whole country.
Conclusion, originality and its contribution to knowledge: the results showed financial and transactional sanctions for tax violators, electronic tax training, intelligent detection of taxable income of natural and legal persons, creating transparency by creating comprehensive information systems and using artificial intelligence and big data in Calculations, dedicated tax collection and payment network, connection and communication with the administrative and executive system of the country and integration of financial and banking systems in the whole country with mutual effects lead to reduction of tax evasion.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Alm, J. (2021). Tax evasion, technology, and inequality. Economics of Governance, 22(4), 321-343.
Alm, J. and and Torgler, B. (2011). Do ethics matter? Tax compliance and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 635–651.
Atayah, O. F; & Alshater, M. M. (2021). Audit and tax in the context of emerging technologies: A retrospective analysis, current trends, and future opportunities. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 21, 95–128.
Atwood, T.J; Drake, M.S; Myers, J.N. and Myers, L.A. (2012). Home country tax system characteristics and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 1831–1860.
Bame-Aldred, C.W; Cullen, J.B; Martin, K.D. and Parboteeah, K.P. (2013). National culture and firm-level tax evasion. Journal of Business Research, 66(3), 390–396.
Benkraiem, R; Uyar, A; Kilic, M. and Schneider, F. (2021). Thical behavior, auditing strength, and tax evasion: A worldwide perspective. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 43, 1-14.
Bolouri A; Moradi, M; Yazdani, H. (2020), Design a Tax Evasion Model Based on Income Tax: Grounded Theory Approach, Governmenta Accounting, 13 (1), 9-30.
Bounabat, B. (2017). From e-government to digital government: stakes and evolution models. Electron. J. Inf. Technol, 10, 8–21.
Cantabene, C. and Grassi, I. (2019). Public and private incentives to R&D cooperation in Italy. Econ. Innov. New Technol, 28 (3), 217–242.
Culiberg, B. and Bajde, D. (2014). Do you need a receipt? Exploring consumer participation in consumption tax evasion as an ethical dilemma. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 271–282.
El-Manaseer, S. A; Al-Kayid, J. H; Al Khawatreh, A. M; & Shamim, M. (2023). The Impact of Digital Transformation on Combating Tax Evasion (Electronic Billing System as a Model). In Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Finance (pp. 679-690). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Fathi, F; Namamian, F; Baghfalaki, A; Hasani, S.R; (2023). Identifiying, integration, weighting and Conceptual model presentation the Components Affecting e-taxation by Meta-synthesis-Shannon Entropy Method, Advertising and Sales Management Journal, 316-333.
Finley, A.R; Lusch, S.J. and Cook, K.A. (2014). The effectiveness of the R&D tax credit: evidence from the alternative simplified credit. J. Am. Tax. Assoc, 37 (1), 157–181.
Gaaya, S; Lakhal, N. and Lakhal, F. (2017). Does family ownership reduce corporate tax avoidance? The moderating effect of audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(7), 731–744.
Hadian, E; and Tahvili, A. (2013). Tax Evasion and Its Determinants in the Iranian Economy (1971-2007). JPBUD. 18(2), 39-58. (In Persian).
Heinemann, M; and Stiller, W. (2024). Digitalization and cross-border tax fraud: evidence from e-invoicing in Italy. International Tax and Public Finance, 1-43.
Khlif, H. and Achek, I. (2015). The determinants of tax evasion: A literature review. International Journal of Law and Management, 57(5), 486–497.
Laplante, S.K; Skaife, H.A. and Swenson, L.A; Wangerin, D.D. (2019). Limits of tax regulation: Evidence from strategic R&D classification and the R&D tax credit. J. Account. Public Policy, 38 (2), 89–105.
Khanifar, H. and Moslemi, N. (2017). Principles and basics of qualitative research methods. Tehran: Negha Danesh. (In Persian).
Kitsios, E; Jalles, J. T; & Verdier, G. (2022). Tax evasion from cross-border fraud: Does digitalization make a difference? Applied Economics Letters, 1–7.
Sameti, M; Izadi, A; and Fathi, S. (2021). Determining Effective Factors on Tax Evasion using the Method of Meta-Analysis Abstract. Stable Economy Journal, 2(2), 1-22. (In Persian).
Masoumi, S; and Yousefi, M. (2014). Investigating the impact of the implementation of the electronic tax system in the tax affairs organization on the process of providing tax services to taxpayers (case study: Finance Administration of Golestan province) First International Conference on Economics, Management, Accounting and Social Sciences،Rasht،https://civilica.com/doc/301619. (In Persian).
Moosavi, R; Aghaei Chadegani, A; Kamali, E; (2023). Designing a model for using big data in the field of taxation of natural persons in order to prevent tax evasion. Governmental Accounting Journal, 10(1), 207-224.
Siglé, M; Goslinga, S; Speklé, R; Van der Hel, L; & Veldhuizen, R. (2018). Corporate tax compliance: Is a change towards trust-based tax strategies justified? Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 32, 3–16.
Slemord, J. (2007). Cheating ourselves: The economics of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 25 -48.
Sung, M.J; Awasthi, R. and Lee, H.C. (2017).  Can Tax Incentives for Electronic Payments Reduce the Shadow Economy?: Korea's Attempt to Reduce Underreporting in Retail Businesses, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 7936, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2896512.
Thuneibat, N.S.M; Ali, B.J.A; Alqaraleh, M.H. and Thneibat, H. (2022). The Mediating Role of Innovation on the Relationship between Information Technologies and Reducing Tax Evasion. Information Sciences Letters, 11(2), 13-23.
Uyar, A; Bani-Mustafa, A; Nimer, K. and Schneider, F. (2021a). Does innovation capacity reduce tax evasion? Moderating effect of intellectual property rights. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 173, 1-13.
Uyar, A; Nimer, K; Kuzey, C; Shahbaz, M. and Schneider, F. (2021b). Can e-government initiatives alleviate tax evasion? The moderation effect of ICT. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 166, 1-14.
Yamen, A; Coskun, A; & Mersni, H. (2023). Digitalization and tax evasion: the moderation effect of corruption. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(2).

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 27 February 2024
  • Revise Date: 13 July 2024
  • Accept Date: 14 July 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics